NeFut Logo NeFut
Admin Login

[CS.AI] Rethinking Penetration Testing for AI Systems

Published at: 2026-07-17 22:00 Last updated: 2026-07-18 08:18
#AI #Security #Penetration Testing

Penetration testing traditionally evaluates whether adversaries can exploit weaknesses in software, infrastructure, configurations, or operational controls to achieve security-relevant compromise. However, this paradigm is insufficient for AI-enabled systems. In such systems, adversaries may influence prompts, retrieved content, sensor inputs, training data, memory, tools, or human-AI interaction loops to alter system behavior without directly compromising the underlying infrastructure. This paper reframes penetration testing for AI-enabled systems as objective-driven behavioral evaluation.

We define an AI-enabled system as one where learned models materially influence behavior affecting operational outcomes, and AI-enabled penetration as the feasible induction of AI-governed behavior that violates one or more operational objectives under an explicit threat model. This definition preserves conventional penetration testing while extending it to adversarial pathways such as prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, data poisoning, sensor manipulation, retrieval poisoning, tool misuse, and agentic misalignment.

We propose a testing workflow that identifies operational objectives, maps AI-governed behavior, analyzes adversarial influence surfaces, defines behavioral failure criteria, executes scenario-based tests, and reports evidence linking adversarial action to objective violation. A running example involving an AI-enabled security operations center assistant illustrates how penetration may occur through behavioral influence rather than infrastructure compromise. Together, the definitions, workflow, and example provide a technical framework for evaluating adversarial success in deployed AI-enabled systems.

Blogger's Review: This paper presents a novel perspective on penetration testing, emphasizing the evaluation of AI system behavior. As AI technology continues to evolve, traditional security assessment methods are becoming inadequate. The proposed workflow offers new insights for security experts, making it a significant contribution worth further exploration.

Original Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14006

[h] Back to Home