NeFut Logo NeFut
Admin Login

[CS.AI] Why Feedback-Augmented Self-Distillation Fails in Retrieval-Interleaved Search Agents

Published at: 2026-07-22 22:00 Last updated: 2026-07-23 12:33
#AI #Machine Learning #optimization

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) offers a promising approach for training large language models without relying on a separate teacher model. However, its effectiveness on complex agentic tasks remains largely unexplored.

In this work, we instantiate Feedback-Augmented Self-Distillation (FA-SD), a self-distillation algorithm for agentic search that leverages successful demonstrations as privileged information. We identify that models can rely on recurring reasoning-and-search output templates, producing trajectories that appear diverse but are largely agnostic to the input question, making the KL-based self-distillation signal uninformative. We term this phenomenon decoding collapse, a failure mode that can be missed by existing evaluation metrics.

To understand its underlying cause, we show that although the self-teacher achieves stronger performance, learning remains inherently unstable due to inconsistent supervision signals. We further decompose this inconsistency into model inconsistency and prompt inconsistency, showing that the latter can significantly degrade the quality of the supervision signal, limiting the effectiveness of self-teacher learning. To mitigate this inconsistency, we introduce an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher to stabilize the self-teacher and provide more consistent supervision signals. Although the EMA teacher requires a warm-up phase during which performance may temporarily regress, it ultimately improves model performance by providing more stable supervision.

Blogger's Review: This paper reveals the limitations of self-distillation algorithms in complex tasks, particularly the impact of decoding collapse. It proposes EMA teacher as a solution, showcasing how to enhance model performance in unstable learning environments, which holds significant theoretical and practical implications. The exploration of model inconsistency and prompt inconsistency provides a fresh perspective for future research.

Original Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17558

[h] Back to Home