Abstract
What gets lost when memory becomes media? Diaspora oral-history interviews require a double transformation; first-person recollection to third-person scene, present interview room to past time and place. When generative AI performs this transformation, no agreed criteria for success exist. We derive success conditions from oral-history theory, design 15 metrics around three failure modes, and compare a Multi-Agent Scene-decomposition pipeline (MAS) with a Single Summarization Pipeline (SSP) across 82 interviews from diaspora communities, spanning from oral interviews to 6-image sequences. Scene-planning and narrative preservation conflict in the majority of cases, and the narrative-structure strength of the source testimony is the primary predictor of this conflict. We propose a failure-mode-based evaluation framework, an empirical analysis of conflict conditions, and a routing protocol for system selection based on narrative-structure strength.
Blogger's Review: This article explores the conflicts in narrative structure encountered during the AI-generated visualization of oral history, emphasizing the importance of maintaining original narratives in technological transformations. By establishing an evaluation framework, the research provides significant theoretical foundations and practical guidance for the digitalization of oral histories in the future.