NeFut Logo NeFut
中 Admin Login

[CS.DS] A Nearly Quadratic Lower Bound for Linear Optimization over Convex Bodies in the Membership Oracle Model

Published at: 2026-11-02 22:00 Last updated: 2026-11-03 01:04
#algorithm #optimization #Data Structure

In the membership‑oracle model, this paper establishes nearly quadratic lower bounds for randomized algorithms that perform linear optimization and uniform sampling over convex bodies. Let $K\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ be a convex body and assume we have access to an oracle that answers whether a query point $x$ belongs to $K$. The linear optimization problem is $$\max_{x\in K} c^{\top}x,$$ where $c\in\mathbb{R}^n$ is a given direction vector.

The authors construct a family of parameterised convex bodies such that any algorithm needs at least $\tilde{\Omega}(n^2)$ oracle calls to distinguish different instances, yielding the lower bound $$T_{\text{opt}}(n)=\tilde{\Omega}(n^2).$$ The $\tilde{\Omega}$ notation hides polylogarithmic factors in $n$. This matches the best known upper bound $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ (e.g., via ellipsoid methods or random‑walk based algorithms), showing that quadratic query complexity is essentially optimal in this model.

For uniform sampling—drawing an approximately uniform point from $K$—the paper proves $$T_{\text{sample}}(n)=\tilde{\Omega}(n^2),$$ improving upon the previously known linear lower bound. Since volume estimation reduces to uniform sampling, the same $\tilde{\Omega}(n^2)$ lower bound applies to volume computation.

The proof hinges on embedding the hidden‑hyperplane problem into a carefully designed family of convex bodies. These bodies are locally indistinguishable under few queries; only by probing a quadratic number of directions can an algorithm gather enough information to separate the instances. An information‑theoretic entropy argument then yields the required query count.

Key technical ideas

Thus, in the pure membership‑oracle setting, linear optimization, uniform sampling, and volume estimation all incur a fundamental $\Theta(n^2)$ query cost up to polylogarithmic factors.

Review

Original Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30215

[h] Back to Home